So, I have a Morally Ambiguous Situation™ here, and I wonder the general opinion of my. . .2 readers.
This happened. The gist of it is that this pastor said that all gays (and lesbians!) should be rounded up and locked electric fence-style, men seperate from women, so that the gay gene would die out.
Never mind this doesn't make any sense, as I believe (but don't quote me on this) that most gay people are spawned from hetero parents. I believe that the pastor in question is a horrible representation of Christianity, and is one of the worst kinds of people.
But. . .I don't know if the article's suggestion of retribution is the best way to go. He suggests that everyone send a donation to some gay-friendly organization in the pastor's name so the pastor will be innundated with thank you letters from the organizations. The author provided the pastor's address, phone number, and e-mail with which to do the signing up.
Now. . .at last count, I saw 190 people who had said they were doing this, sending some donation to a group in the pastor's name.
This is where it gets a little sketchy for me. Is this pastor dead wrong? Absolutely. Does he need to be prevented from speaking in public ever again? Yes. Yes he does. Is he the reason so many people hate Christianity? For sure.
But this seems. . .over-reaching to me. I don't know. I can't reconcile it in my head. What, exactly, are these people hoping to accomplish? It's awesome that all these organizations are getting donations, but. . .why does it have to be done this way? I can't decide if someone as douchey as this pastor is also giving up his right to privacy and not wanting to receive literature from these organizations by being douchey.
And then there were a couple of comments left on this article that REALLY bothered me.
One lady ". . .did this for a 'Pro-Life' neighbor, made a donation to Planned Parenthood in his honor. They sent him a letter of acknowledgement. I never heard another word from him about the sinful pro-choice people;-)."
Like. . .it's the guy's right to be anti-abortion, and he's being sort of harassed about it. What if the guy had sent pro-life literature to this lady? Would that have been OK, too? Granted, I don't know if he made a big deal about it or if he was a jerk or whatever, but I don't. . .think it should matter.
Then. . .
"This is an idea I did 30+ years ago to a preacher at a liberal arts college I was going to. Being Southern Baptist and feeling I needed to experience his god...got a postcard from the LDS church out of a magazine and filled in his information. Four years later...he was still wondering why he was getting twice yearly visits from LDS missionaries in the dorm. Last I heard...he had at least two copies of the Book of Mormon and one of the gigantic tome with all the writings in it."
This seems invasive, too.
But it was this one that really raised my hackles:
"I had a similar neighbor and he had a pro-choice bumper sticker on his car. I went over one veeery early morning and overlaid it with a pro-choice bumper sticker. It was weeks before he discovered it."
I feel like this one, if you want to be dramatic, borders on tresspassing and destruction of someone else's property. At the very least, it made her even more douchey than the pro-life neighbor. Why do people feel (on both sides of the fence) that if someone disagrees with them, they have the right to mess with the other person?
So what do you think? Is it good to harass people through the mail? Are you in the right? Is the only opinion that matters yours?
This whole thing really bugged me, so I want to know what other people think.